Tata-Mistry: Supreme Court stays NCLAT order dismissing RoC plea seeking modification of verdict

The Supreme Court Friday stayed the order of appellate tribunal NCLAT which had dismissed the plea of Registrar of Companies seeking modification of its verdict in the Tata-Cyrus Mistry case

Press Trust of India January 24, 2020 15:28:23 IST
Tata-Mistry: Supreme Court stays NCLAT order dismissing RoC plea seeking modification of verdict
  • A bench, comprising Chief Justice S A Bobde and Justices B R Gavai and Surya Kant, agreed to hear the appeal of Tata Sons Pvt Ltd (TSPL) and issued notice to the parties concerned

  • The apex court said it would hear the matter along with the main plea filed by Tata Sons against the verdict of National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT)

  • NCLAT held that conversion of Tata Sons from a public company to a private one by the RoC was "illegal"

New Delhi: The Supreme Court Friday stayed the order of appellate tribunal NCLAT which had dismissed the plea of Registrar of Companies seeking modification of its verdict in the Tata-Cyrus Mistry case.

A bench, comprising Chief Justice S A Bobde and Justices B R Gavai and Surya Kant, agreed to hear the appeal of Tata Sons Pvt Ltd (TSPL) and issued notice to the parties concerned.

The apex court said it would hear the matter along with the main plea filed by Tata Sons against the verdict of National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT).

TSPL challenged the 18 December decision of NCLAT which gave a big relief to Cyrus Investment Pvt Ltd and Mistry, restoring him as the executive chairman of TSPL.

NCLAT had ordered the reinstatement of Mistry as the head of Tata Sons, the holding company of $110 billion salt-to-software conglomerate, saying his 2016 sacking was wrong.

It also held that conversion of Tata Sons from a public company to a private one by the RoC was "illegal".

Subsequently, the RoC, under the Union Corporate Affairs Ministry, had moved a petition seeking deletion of words "illegal" and "with the help of the RoC" on the issue of conversion of Tata Sons into a private company.

Rejecting the prayer for amendment in the Judgment, NCLAT observed that the judgment did not cast aspersions on the RoC and said this is a "wrong perception" as no observation has been made against the RoC, Mumbai, nor anything alleged against him.

TataMistry Supreme Court stays NCLAT order dismissing RoC plea seeking modification of verdict

File image of Ratan Tata and Cyrus Mistry. Photo credit: AFP.

On 10 January, the apex court had stayed the NCLAT order restoring Mistry as executive chairman of the Tata Group, observing that there were "lacunae" in the orders passed by the tribunal.

It also said that the NCLAT decision suffers from "basic errors" and the matter needs to be heard in detail.

While ordering an interim stay of the NCLAT order, the bench also said, "You (Cyrus) have been out of the saddle for quite a long time. Does this hurt you now. How does it (stay order) hurt you today".

The apex court said there was no prayer in the petition for reinstatement of Mistry but the tribunal went ahead with it and ordered that.

The top court had directed that the Tatas will not exercise power under Article 75 of the 'Articles of Association' for pushing out shares of minority holders in the company.

The Article empowers the company to, at any time, to transfer ordinary shares of any shareholders without following the normal procedure of transfer.

TSPL, formerly known as Tata Sons Limited, had sought setting aside of the NCLAT judgment in toto, alleging it was "completely inconsistent with the annals of corporate law" and reflected "non-appreciation of facts", which was "untenable in law".

Updated Date:

also read

India should now help US on reproductive rights laws
World

India should now help US on reproductive rights laws

It is bizarre that with the overturning of the Roe V Wade judgement, the US is left fumbling on an issue that India legislated on half-a-century ago

Powers under preventive detention law 'exceptional', cannot be exercised in routine manner, says SC
India

Powers under preventive detention law 'exceptional', cannot be exercised in routine manner, says SC

The apex court observation came as it set aside the October last year order of detention of two persons in Telangana

Prophet row: Ex-bureaucrats seek Supreme Court's intervention to check 'bulldozing' in UP
India

Prophet row: Ex-bureaucrats seek Supreme Court's intervention to check 'bulldozing' in UP

The BJP on 5 June suspended its national spokesperson Nupur Sharma and expelled its Delhi media head Naveen Kumar Jindal after their controversial remarks against the Prophet