Supreme Court seeks former Tata Trusts head R Venkataramanan's reply on Shapoorji Pallonji's plea

The Supreme Court Thursday sought a response from R Venkataramanan, a former managing trustee of Tata Trusts, on an appeal of Shapoorji Pallonji Group challenging the quashing of its defamation case against him

Press Trust of India July 04, 2019 13:06:16 IST
Supreme Court seeks former Tata Trusts head R Venkataramanan's reply on Shapoorji Pallonji's plea
  • The Bombay High Court had quashed a prosecution order issued by a magistrate court against Venkataramanan in the defamation case

  • In October 2018, the magistrate's court at Ballard Pier had issued the process of summoning Venkataramanan after the Shapoorji Pallonji Group filed the criminal defamation case against him

  • In the complaint, the Shapoorji Pallonji Group, which owns 18.6-percent stake in the Tata Group, had alleged that Venkataramanan had made some comments in a press note which were false and defamatory to the group

New Delhi: The Supreme Court Thursday sought a response from R Venkataramanan, a former managing trustee of Tata Trusts, on an appeal of Shapoorji Pallonji Group challenging the quashing of its defamation case against him.

"This is nothing but a corporate war," a bench comprising Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice Deepak Gupta said, while issuing a notice to Venkataramanan.

Senior advocate Mahesh Jethmalani, appearing for Shapoorji Pallonji Group, said that the defamation complaint filed by the firm was quashed by the Bombay High Court erroneously.

The Bombay High Court had quashed a prosecution order issued by a magistrate court against Venkataramanan in the defamation case.

Supreme Court seeks former Tata Trusts head R Venkataramanans reply on Shapoorji Pallonjis plea

File photo of R Venkataramanan. Image courtesy: Tata Trusts website

In October 2018, the magistrate's court at Ballard Pier had issued the process of summoning Venkataramanan after the Shapoorji Pallonji Group filed the criminal defamation case against him.

In the complaint, the Shapoorji Pallonji Group, which owns 18.6-percent stake in the Tata Group, had alleged that Venkataramanan had made some comments in a press note which were false and defamatory to the group.

In the press note, Venkataramanan had allegedly stated that in his capacity as a non-executive director of Air Asia India, he had been wrongly named as an accused by the CBI.

The Bombay High Court had said in its 27 March order that there was nothing defamatory in the press note, and quashed the process issued against Venkataramanan.

"I am of the view that the words which are used in the press note are not at all defamatory. They are moderate and temperate. They do not invite contempt, ridicule or hatred against the persons mentioned in the press note and much less the complainant," the high court judge had said.

The low-cost carrier AirAsia India is a 51:49 percent joint venture between Tata Sons and Malaysian carrier AirAsia.

In an FIR registered on 29 May, 2018, the CBI named Venkataramanan and other top executives of the AirAsia group, for allegedly entering into a criminal conspiracy with unknown public servants to alter the rules to get early overseas flying rights.

Venkataramanan had resigned from the Tata Trusts after the tax department sent notices to the charity over his inflated salaries and threatened to end its tax-breaks to the country's largest and oldest public charity.

Updated Date:

Subscribe to Moneycontrol Pro at ₹499 for the first year. Use code PRO499. Limited period offer. *T&C apply

also read

MJ Akbar vs Priya Ramani MeToo case updates: Photos of Ramani with Rebecca John flood social media, lawyer says 'most important case of career'
India

MJ Akbar vs Priya Ramani MeToo case updates: Photos of Ramani with Rebecca John flood social media, lawyer says 'most important case of career'

MJ Akbar vs Priya Ramani MeToo case updates: After a Delhi court acquitted Ramani in a criminal defamation complaint by Akbar, her lawyer Rebecca John said it was difficult trial and the case was the most important in her career.

Full text: Priya Ramani acquitted in MJ Akbar defamation case; FP report cited in verdict
India

Full text: Priya Ramani acquitted in MJ Akbar defamation case; FP report cited in verdict

The court, in its order, also made some important observations on sexual harassment, its effect on the survivors and the social stigma attached to it.

Priya Ramani acquitted in MJ Akbar defamation case: 'Happy and proud', 'watershed moment'; journalists hail Delhi court's verdict
India

Priya Ramani acquitted in MJ Akbar defamation case: 'Happy and proud', 'watershed moment'; journalists hail Delhi court's verdict

Ramani had made allegation of sexual misconduct against Akbar in the wake of the #MeToo movement in 2018. Akbar had filed the complaint against Ramani on 15 October, 2018, for allegedly defaming him by accusing him of sexual misconduct decades ago