Most analysts were taken by surprise when the Supreme Court quashed Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) 12 February circular on Tuesday. The quashing of the circular outright was least expected. The expectations ranged from some tweaking of the conditions of the circular to even upholding it in its entirety to safeguard the larger interests of banking sector and leave the non-performing asset (NPA) battle to the RBI. But what happened was a shocker to the banking sector.
The 12 February circular was, by far, the strictest modification on the NPA recognition rules in such a way that even a single day’s default would trigger punitive measures from the bank consortium on a large corporate borrower. This could include forcing the company to urgently come up with a repayment plan either by selling non-core assets or preparing for imminent bankruptcy proceedings.
It made banks resolve the problem in 180 days failing which such accounts must be referred to National Company Law Tribunals (NLCTs) for resolution for large account of Rs 2,000 crore and above.
Even after the SC ruling, banks can still refer defaulting companies to NCLT but they will have to wait longer to do so. When large companies default, each day of default adds to the stress of the bank and a delayed resolution widens their losses.
Even though this rule was originally meant for power companies, the circular applied to others as well. Rating agency, ICRA, estimates the total debt impacted due to the 12 February circular to be around Rs 3.8 lakh crore across 70 large borrowers of which Rs 2 lakh crore across 34 borrowers were in the power sector.
Nearly 92 percent of this debt has been classified as non-performing by banks as of March 2018 and also made provisions of over 25-40 percent on these accounts.
With the SC quashing the circular itself, this process will get delayed causing taking things back to the old era when defaulting companies enjoyed the privilege of time and relaxed rules to take the banks for a ride.
The judiciary should have let the RBI run the NPA clean up process in the way it deems fit but decided to meddle with the process. In August last year, the Allahabad High Court’s decision to deny interim relief to power companies with respect to the 12 February circular had given hopes that judiciary is finally acknowledging the fact that there can’t be exceptions in the fight against NPAs. By sticking to the well-laid down rules of the RBI was just the right thing for the apex court to do at a time when the banking sector is neck-deep in bad loans.
But the latest SC ruling once again put the central bank on the back foot. It also raises larger questions about the power vested on the central bank under the RBI Act.
The SC’s ruling is disappointing and regressive also from the reforms point of view. One of the biggest hopes when IBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code) came to picture under the Narendra Modi government was that banking sector will now get a freehand to administer bitter pills to wilful defaulters by dragging them to bankruptcy courts.
In the past, cash-rich promoters of defaulting companies used to drag banks to court rooms for years on end to delay the repayment. The 12 February circular was a powerful tool for the banks to use the IBC channel without delay. But the hopes of a timely resolution has been dashed by the apex court with its decision and sets a bad precedent in the sector.
Your guide to the latest election news, analysis, commentary, live updates and schedule for Lok Sabha Elections 2019 on firstpost.com/elections. Follow us on Twitter and Instagram or like our Facebook page for updates from all 543 constituencies for the upcoming general elections.
Updated Date: Apr 03, 2019 12:32:15 IST