Regulatory changes make ATM operations unviable; half of 2.38 lakh machines in India likely to be closed down by March 2019

Closure of the ATMs will impact thousands of jobs and also the the financial inclusion efforts of the government, the industry body said in a statement.

Press Trust of India November 21, 2018 16:30:43 IST
Regulatory changes make ATM operations unviable; half of 2.38 lakh machines in India likely to be closed down by March 2019

Mumbai: Changes in regulatory landscape are making it unviable to operate ATMs, and may lead to the closure of half of the 2.38 lakh machines in the country by March 2019, the Confederation of ATM Industry (CATMi) warned Wednesday.

Closure of the ATMs will impact thousands of jobs and also the the financial inclusion efforts of the government, the industry body said in a statement.

"Service providers may be forced to close down almost 1.13 lakh ATMs across the country by March 2019. These numbers include approximately one lakh off-site ATMs and a little over 15,000 white label ATMs," it said.

Regulatory changes make ATM operations unviable half of 238 lakh machines in India likely to be closed down by March 2019

Representational image. Reuters.

The industry has reached a "tipping point", the body added.

A majority of the ATMs which can be shut down will be in the non-urban areas, it said, underlining that this can impact the financial inclusion efforts as beneficiaries use the machines to withdraw government subsidies.

The industry body said that recent regulatory changes, including those on hardware and software upgrades, coupled with mandates on cash management standards and the cassette swap method of loading cash, will make ATM operations unviable, resulting in the closure.

The new cash logistics and cassette swap method will alone result in costs of Rs 3,000 crore for the industry, it estimated.

It added that the ATM industry, including managed service providers, brown-label ATM deployers and white label ATM operators (WLAO), is still reeling under the shock of demonetisation.

"The situation has further deteriorated now due to the additional compliance requirements that call for a huge cost outlay. The service providers do not have the financial means to meet such massive costs and may be forced to shut down these ATMs," it said.

The only way to salvage the situation for the industry, according to the body, is if banks "step in to bear the load of the additional cost of compliances".

"Unless ATM deployers are compensated by banks for making these investments, there is likely to be a scenario where contracts are surrendered, leading to large scale  closure of ATMs," it said.

Revenues for providing ATMs as a service are not growing at all due to very low ATM interchange charges and ever-increasing costs, it said, adding that such changes in the landscape were not anticipated while signing contracts with the banks.

The WLAOs have accumulated losses and the compliance costs can result in over 15,000 machines run by them shutting down, the industry body added.

Updated Date:

also read

Modi invokes imaginative powers of aam aadmi to liven up BJP's mega financial inclusion plan
Finance

Modi invokes imaginative powers of aam aadmi to liven up BJP's mega financial inclusion plan

The government is making preparations on war footing to push its mega plan of distributing 15 crore free bank accounts with benefits to unbanked citizens in the far-flung areas of the country.<br />

Making ATM transactions expensive: Is RBI contradicting its own stance?
Finance

Making ATM transactions expensive: Is RBI contradicting its own stance?

By suddenly making ATM transactions expensive, the RBI has broken the process of gradual transition to paperless banking and is sending people back to the congested bank branches to withdraw money.

Exclusive: Talk of cashless economy ‘unreal’, agenda of MNCs, says former RBI dy gov KC Chakrabarty
Business

Exclusive: Talk of cashless economy ‘unreal’, agenda of MNCs, says former RBI dy gov KC Chakrabarty

Even if RBI opposed demonetisation, the government would have gone ahead with it.