Nigerian assets at risk worldwide in $9 billion arbitration case

By Libby George LAGOS (Reuters) - A British judge has said he will grant a firm called Process and Industrial Developments Ltd (P&ID) the right to attempt to seize some $9 billion in assets from the Nigerian government over an aborted gas project. The company was awarded $6.6 billion in an arbitration decision over the failed 2010 project to build a gas-processing plant in the southern Nigerian city of Calabar.

Reuters August 30, 2019 04:06:25 IST
Nigerian assets at risk worldwide in $9 billion arbitration case

Nigerian assets at risk worldwide in 9 billion arbitration case

By Libby George

LAGOS (Reuters) - A British judge has said he will grant a firm called Process and Industrial Developments Ltd (P&ID) the right to attempt to seize some $9 billion in assets from the Nigerian government over an aborted gas project.

The company was awarded $6.6 billion in an arbitration decision over the failed 2010 project to build a gas-processing plant in the southern Nigerian city of Calabar. With interest, the sum now tops $9 billion - 20% of Nigeria's foreign reserves.

Nigerian officials vowed not to surrender any assets.

WHAT IS AT STAKE?

P&ID can target real estate, bank accounts or any kind of moveable wealth, but it has to prove that the property is unrelated to Nigeria's operations as a sovereign state.

"The onus will be on the claimant to prove that the property is exclusively in use for commercial purposes," Simon Sloane of law firm Fieldfisher said. "It's quite a difficult hurdle to overcome."

State assets that have any diplomatic function - such as a commercial property that is also used to issue visas - cannot be seized.

But state asset seizures "happen all the time", said James Langley, a partner with international law firm Dentons and an expert in arbitration.

In a 2008 case against Chad, a UK judge ruled that proceeds of oil sales held for the purpose of making repayments to the World Bank qualified as commercial assets.

And in 2018, a U.S. judge cleared the way for a Canadian mining firm to target shares in a U.S. oil refinery owned by state oil company Petroleos de Venezuela SA (PDVSA) over an arbitration debt owed by Venezuela.

The Nigerian government holds bank accounts in foreign jurisdictions including Britain. Nigeria's state oil firm NNPC also owns some of the oil cargoes that sail from the country's shores. Ultimately, a judge would have to rule on whether any individual asset was subject to seizure.

ARE NIGERIA'S ASSETS SAFE?

The Aug. 16 ruling converts the arbitration award to a judgement, giving it the same force as a British court ruling. This would be recognised across the European Union as long as Britain remained a member.

Sloane said Nigeria's best protection would be to ensure it had no significant commercial assets in any jurisdiction that could be exposed to an asset execution.

But the arbitration award itself also allows P&ID to seek to seize assets in any of the 160 countries that are part of the New York Convention - a global pact for the recognition and enforcement of arbitration awards.

Sloane and Langley said there was a long history of successful asset seizures using the New York Convention.

WHAT ARE NIGERIA'S OPTIONS?

Nigerian officials said they would appeal. In Britain, their prospects are limited, experts told Reuters.

"Nigeria would have to apply to set aside the order for enforcement and that may be difficult to achieve," Langley said.

A set-aside request would have to prove there was an error in the ruling. Langley said the judge's decision was not legally controversial.

Lawyers representing the Nigerian government argued the award should not be enforced because England was not the correct place for the case, and even if it were, the amount awarded was "manifestly excessive".

But the decision on the UK as the seat of arbitration was made in 2016, and the arbitration award was made in 2017. Nigeria had 28 days in each case to appeal. It appealed the former decision, but missed the deadline by several months and a judge dismissed it. It never appealed the latter decision.

Nigeria successfully applied to have the award set aside by the Federal High Court in Lagos.

But in English law, judges do not typically review either the decision on the seat of arbitration or the underlying award once the window for appeal has passed, Sloane and Langley said.

Nigerian Information Minister Lai Mohammed said there was no imminent threat to Nigeria's assets while the case was underway.

But once the court makes its judgement into an order, which is expected in September, P&ID could start targeting assets.

To delay this, Nigeria would also have to request a stay of enforcement while the set-aside request is considered. A set-aside request ruling is quick in legal terms - a matter of weeks or months rather than a year or more, Langley said.

IS $9 BILLION AN UNUSUALLY LARGE AWARD?

Arbitration awards in the billions are not uncommon. Langley said the method used to determine the figure, based on expected earnings over the life of the contract, was standard for commercial arbitration.

A co-founder of P&ID testified during the arbitration that the company spent $40 million before the project failed, but Langley said the sum was not necessarily relevant.

The award, Langley said, is "just a function of the kind of contract this was", reflecting potentially large profits.

Parties at this stage would typically reach a settlement that is often well below the award, the experts said.

WHAT IS NIGERIA DOING?

In addition to fighting the UK ruling, Mohammed said Nigeria "will strongly avail itself of all defences customarily afforded to sovereign states ... to stave off any enforcement of the award".

Nigeria is also fighting a P&ID effort to convert the arbitration award to a judgement in a U.S. federal court.

The information minister made no mention of seeking a settlement.

The government has also asked its anti-graft agency, intelligence agency and police inspector general to investigate P&ID and the circumstances surrounding the deal, which, it said, "includes commencing a full-scale criminal investigation".

In a statement, P&ID said government allegations that the gas project was designed to fail were "entirely fictional" and "will not make the legal obligation to pay go away."

(Reporting by Libby George; Editing by Dale Hudson and Tom Brown)

This story has not been edited by Firstpost staff and is generated by auto-feed.

Updated Date:

TAGS:

Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Get technology news, gadgets reviews & ratings. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison.

also read

Oil rises 2% as OPEC complies with production cuts
Business

Oil rises 2% as OPEC complies with production cuts

By Jessica Resnick-Ault NEW YORK (Reuters) - Oil prices strengthened on Wednesday, as OPEC and its allies were seen complying with a pact to cut oil supply in September, even as concerns loomed that recovery in fuel demand will be stalled by soaring global coronavirus cases. Early in the day crude was boosted by a bullish stock market. Even as equities whipsawed on pandemic worries, oil stayed higher, buoyed by expectations that OPEC could staunch a supply glut

Tesla's back-to-back price cuts bring sticker on U.S. Model S below $70,000
Business

Tesla's back-to-back price cuts bring sticker on U.S. Model S below $70,000

By Tina Bellon and C Nivedita (Reuters) - Tesla Inc will further cut the price of its Model S "Long Range" sedan in the United States to $69,420, the electric carmaker's chief executive, Elon Musk, announced in a tweet https://bit.ly/2H0JCP0 on Wednesday. The anticipated drop marks the second time this week Tesla has cut the price for the high-end sedan, following a 4% cut of the Model S's price in the United States on Tuesday to $71,990.

Trump cites teenaged son's bout with coronavirus in calling for schools to reopen
World

Trump cites teenaged son's bout with coronavirus in calling for schools to reopen

By Jeff Mason DES MOINES, Iowa (Reuters) - Under siege over his handling of the novel coronavirus pandemic, President Donald Trump on Wednesday cited what he said was his son's mild bout of the virus as a reason why American schools should reopen as soon as possible. Trump made the comment about his son, Barron, as the president swept into Iowa on a mission to shore up support in battleground states that he won in 2016 but is in danger of losing to Democrat Joe Biden barely three weeks before the election. First lady Melania Trump announced in a statement earlier in the day that the virus that struck both her and her husband had also infected their 14-year-old son