NDTV says SEBI order asking Prannoy and Radhika Roy to step down as directors 'bad in law'; duo to challenge market regulator in court
The Roy couple has also been barred from holding a board or key managerial position at any other listed company for one year, SEBI said while coming down heavily on them and RRPR Holdings Pvt Ltd for what it termed as violation of various regulations by keeping minority shareholders in the dark about three loan agreements.
SEBI on Friday barred NDTV Ltd's three key promoters — Prannoy Roy, Radhika Roy and their holding firm — from the capital markets for two years
The Roy couple has also been barred from holding a board or key managerial position at any other listed company for one year
They have been fined for violation of various regulations by keeping minority shareholders in the dark about three loan agreements
NDTV on Friday decried as "outrageous" the order of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) barring the company's three key promoters — Prannoy Roy, Radhika Roy and their holding firm — from the capital markets for two years. The market regulator also restrained the two individuals from holding any board or top management role at the company in this period.
SEBI also barred the Roys from holding a board or key managerial position at any other listed company for one year. The regulator has claimed that the couple and RRPR Holdings Pvt Ltd had violated various regulations by keeping minority shareholders in the dark about three loan agreements. One such loan agreement was with ICICI Bank, and two loans were from a little-known entity Vishvapradhan Commercial Private Ltd (VCPL).
"Radhika and Prannoy Roy, the founders of NDTV, believe the SEBI order asking them to step down as directors and to not hold any management positions in NDTV is outrageous, bad in law and against all procedures," news channel said in a statement. "It is, for example, unheard of that the order contains false decisions on issues that were not even mentioned in the show cause notice. They will challenge the SEBI order in the courts as advised within the next few days."
The ownership of Delhi-based 'wholesale trading' firm VCPL, incorporated in 2008, is said to have later changed hands from RIL to the Nahata group, from which the Mukesh Ambani-led firm had bought Infotel Broadband in 2010 to re-enter the telecom business.
Earlier, in 2018, SEBI had ordered VCPL to make an open offer for NDTV Ltd for indirectly acquiring control of up to 52 percent stake through a convertible loan of Rs 350 crore in 2009 'sourced' from a subsidiary of Reliance Industries Ltd.
In its latest 51-page order, SEBI said all its directions, including debarment of RRPR, Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy from buying, selling or otherwise dealing directly or indirectly in securities, or being associated with the securities market, will come into effect immediately. Their existing holdings, including mutual fund units, will remain frozen during the prohibition period, SEBI said.
SEBI said its probe began after receipt of complaints in 2017 from Quantum Securities Pvt Ltd, a shareholder of New Delhi Television Ltd (NDTV), about an alleged violation of rules by non-disclosure of material information to the shareholders about loan agreements with VCPL. The ICICI Bank loan had a clause wherein the three promoters of NDTV Ltd had undertaken not to permit any major corporate restructuring, merger etc without the prior written approval of the lender. Investigations found that another loan agreement was signed with VCPL for a loan of Rs 350 crore later, which did not carry any interest rate, to repay the ICICI Bank loan that had an interest rate of 19 percent.
However, one of the terms of the new loan effectively gave VCPL control over the entire shareholding of RRPR Holdings. The agreement gave further significant powers to VCPL and it was significantly material and price-sensitive in nature, as per the order. A second loan agreement for Rs 53.85 crore was also signed with VCPL a year later that provided for the promoters of NDTV Ltd allowing the lender to indirectly acquire 30 percent stake in the media company through the conversion of their warrants into equity shares of RRPR Holdings.
It was alleged that by concealing such material information from the public shareholders for a period when the promoters were themselves dealing in the company shares, they had committed a fraud on the minority public shareholders. Noting that the company was bound to intimate such material information to the public shareholders to help them take informed investment decision, SEBI said "the loan agreements were unmistakably structured as a scheme to defraud the investors by camouflaging the information about the adversarial terms and conditions impinging upon the interest of NDTV Ltd's shareholders."
SEBI said Roys have been the face of NDTV Ltd and the prime movers of all its activities, while they were also actively running the day-to-day management as chairman and managing director. Under the circumstances, they had "avowed duty to act in a fair and transparent manner to protect the interest of their minority shareholders and not to indulge in any fraudulent activity or any activity detrimental to the interest of the shareholders of NDTV Ltd". "However, contrary to the same, in the present case, the noticees — the promoters and directors of NDTV Ltd — have been found to have indulged in fraudulent acts wherein they have bartered away the interests of NDTV Ltd by making them subject to prior written consent of ICICI/VCPL without disclosing the same to the company (NDTV Ltd)," SEBI said.
The regulator also accused them of having violated the Code of Conduct of NDTV Ltd , which they were supposed to abide by as chairman and MD. "Any fraudulent act directly designed to defraud such investors cannot be treated as good for the securities market and for the interest of investors. Such acts, if not dealt with adequately and sternly, will send a wrong signal to the violators having same or similar propensity and will not be good for the securities market," the regulator said in its order.
With inputs from PTI