NCLAT verdict on Tata Sons: Corporate Affairs Ministry seeks modification in appellate tribunal order

New Delhi: The Corporate Affairs Ministry on Monday moved the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal seeking certain modification in its order in the Tata Sons matter. The Registrar of Companies (RoC) on Monday moved the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) requesting to amend its order and remove the word “illegal” with respect to the conversion of Tata Sons from a public company to private company. The petition filed by RoC was mentioned on Monday before NCLAT, which has directed to list the matter on 2 January, 2020 for hearing. [caption id=“attachment_4338547” align=“alignleft” width=“380”] Representational image. Reuters.[/caption] In its petition, RoC had asked “to carry out the requisite amendment in paragraphs…. of the judgement dated 18 December, 2019 to correctly reflect the conduct of RoC Mumbai as not being illegal and being as per the provisions of the Companies Act along with the rules.” It has also asked NCLAT to “delete the aspersion made regarding any hurried help accorded by RoC Mumbai to Tata Sons except what was statutorily required by RoC Mumbai”. RoC also said it has acted in “bonafide manner” in converting the status of Tata Sons as “there was no stay granted by this appellate tribunal on the operation of the judgement dated 9 July, 2018 of Mumbai, NCLT at the time when this intimation was filed by Tata Sons Ltd.” RoC has also asked to implead it as party in the matter. Passing an order on 18 December, NCLAT had directed for the reinstatement of ousted Cyrus Mistry as Chairman of Tata Sons. In that order, the appellate tribunal has also quashed the conversion of Tata Sons - the principal holding company and promoter of Tata firms - into a private company from a public firm and had termed it as “illegal”. The appellate tribunal has said that the action taken by the RoC to allow the firm to become a private company was against the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and ‘prejudicial’ and ‘oppressive’ to the minority member (Mistry Camp). “The Company (Tata Sons) shall be recorded as ‘Public Company’. The RoC will make correction in its record showing the Company as ‘Public Company’,” said NCLAT. Months after Mistry was sacked, Tata Sons had received its shareholders’ nod in September 2017, to convert itself into a private limited company from a public limited company, thereby absolving it of the need to take shareholder consent in taking crucial decisions, which could be passed with be passed with just the board’s approval. Tata Sons Ltd was initially a ‘Private Company’ but after insertion of Section 43A (1A) in the Companies Act, 1956 on the basis of average annual turnover, it assumed the character of a deemed ‘Public Company’ with effect from 1 February, 1975, the order said.