Jet Airways crisis: Delhi High Court to hear in May plea for refund, alternative flights to grounded passengers
The plea said the sudden suspension of air services of Jet Airways has resulted in a major crisis for the passengers who were not informed about it earlier
The application sought direction to the ministry and Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) to adopt prompt redressal mechanism
After months of uncertainty, Jet Airways announced a temporary suspension of its operations on 17 April
A day after the airline suspended operations, hundreds of employees gathered in Delhi seeking measures to revive the carrier
New Delhi: The Delhi High Court Wednesday said it will hear next week the plea seeking direction to the Civil Aviation Ministry and the DGCA to ensure refunds or provide alternative travel mode for passengers who have booked tickets with Jet Airways, which has temporarily suspended all its domestic and international flights.
A bench of Chief Justice Rajendra Menon and Justice AJ Bhambhani, however, remarked that "it (plea) is filed only for publicity, come on 1 May".
The bench observed that the petition was all in the media reports even before coming up for hearing in the court.
The plea, filed by activist Bejon Kumar Misra, said the sudden suspension of air services of Jet Airways has resulted in a major crisis for the passengers who were not informed about it earlier.
The application sought direction to the ministry and Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) to adopt prompt redressal mechanism for all affected passengers to access full refund of air tickets with reasonable compensation or arrange an alternative mode of travel for them to reach their destination as an emergency exercise.
The plea, filed through advocates Shashank Deo Sudhi and Shashi Bhushan, said: "It is common knowledge that all competitor airlines have exorbitantly increased their airfares and the toothless and vulnerable consumers are constrained to suffer not only in terms of money, but also in terms of mental harassment of unprecedented scale."
Citing media report, it said more than Rs 360 crore of the passengers/consumers' hard earned money is under threat due to non-refund of ticket value.
"The passengers have to not only purchase alternative tickets at highly exorbitant cost, but also go through lots of anxieties and mental agony. This has resulted in profiteering by other airlines at the cost of the passengers and till date no relief has been announced by the respondents (Ministry and DGCA).
"It is on record that such a situation was existing for more than two years, but was intentionally allowed by the authorities without any concern for passengers and other affected parties," the plea claimed.
It also said an amendment to the existing laws and appointment of an effective regulator is the need of the hour to protect the interest of passengers and regulate airfares in an open and transparent manner to avoid such events in future.
After months of uncertainty, Jet Airways announced a temporary suspension of its operations on 17 April as it failed to receive emergency funds from lenders.
A day after the airline suspended operations, hundreds of employees gathered in the national capital seeking measures to revive the carrier, which has been in operation for nearly 26 years.
Domestic lenders have invited bids for selling stake in Jet Airways. On 18 April, the lenders said they were "reasonably hopeful" that the bidding process for the airline would end successfully.
PepsiCo India’s patent for the FC5 potato variety, which is used to make its popular Lay’s chips, was revoked in 2021. The multinational food and beverage company has moved the Delhi High Court seeking suspension of the revocation order
An ultra-sweet concoction of herbs and fruits, Rooh Afza means ‘refresher of the soul’. The Hamdard National Foundation manufactures Rooh Afza in India, while Hamdard Laboratories (Waqf) has the rights to the drink in Pakistan
A bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad also granted four weeks' time to the Centre to file its reply in the matter in terms of an earlier order passed by the court