If the Income Tax Department can go to town, the RBI too could name and shame defaulters
Naming and shaming has greater justification in the context of loan defaults vis-à-vis income tax defaults.
The Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation has been reportedly resorting to dhindora peetna (exposing a defaulter with drumbeats) to shame property tax defaulters in their own biradri i.e. neighbourhood. The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) too has been doing the same with regard to income tax defaulters except that instead of taking to streets, it resorts to advertisements in newspapers. The CBDT strategy might be less noisy and boisterous but it expects it to bear surer results --- a thick-skinned property tax defaulter in Ahmedabad might shrug off the momentary, fleeting and local exposure but a newspaper insertion has a wider and permanent reach and impact.
In fact the CBDT says the very purpose of the ads are not only to name and shame income tax defaulters but more importantly to enable public-spirited citizens to become informers should they have in their possession the whereabouts of defaulters.
In the latest such expose’ of the CBDT on 29 March 2018, 24 defaulters owing Rs 490 crore find mention with many of them not traceable in their given addresses. The CBDT perhaps would do well to incentivise the public by offering a reward to those who inform it of the address or the location of their hideouts or give enough clues for it to smoke them out.
One wonders if the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) or the government of India can send a team of dhindora players to shame the fugitive Vijay Mallya of Kingfisher infamy, who owes the Indian banking system upwards of Rs 9000 crore at the last count but is blasé about it and is leading a lavish life on the outskirts of London.
One also wonders if the British tabloid press would carry ads by the Indian government or the RBI explaining vividly the banking capers and exploits of the fugitive who is currently facing extradition proceedings. Incidentally such a vivid and concise ad would also be noticed by the extradition court adding to the weight of the Indian government’s plea for extradition.
But the more important issue is why the RBI is not resorting to the dhindora or ad strategy of the Ahmadabad municipal corporation and CBDT respectively or both. It is clinging onto an archaic provision in the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 to cosset the loan defaulters ---theirs is a fiduciary relationship with the banks. In a fiduciary relationship, confidentiality is an implicit feature. Touché! Confidentiality can be expected by those who are law abiding and pay their dues on time. A defaulter cannot invoke confidentiality for his shenanigans. It is strange that the Supreme Court (SC) while repeatedly asking why the RBI is not naming and shaming is strangely reluctant to strike down the archaic provision.
The truth is naming and shaming has greater justification in the context of loan defaults vis-à-vis income tax defaults because while income tax assessments are often high-pitched and often struck down on appeal, loans and interest thereon cannot be exaggerated. In fact loan outstandings are accurate to the last rupee. With NPAs assuming dangerous proportions at around 14 percent of the banks’ loan portfolio, the RBI and government have to think of unconventional methods of loan recovery.
If thugs could be in the past sent to accost car-loan defaulters in the middle of the road while awaiting a green-signal, there is no reason why the pincer of the dhindora—ad strategy should not be used in naming and shaming the loan defaulters. Decks must be cleared for this purpose may be by promulgating an ordinance.
One must however hasten to add that naming and shaming has its own limitations. Thick-skinned defaulters might care two hoots for it. And secondly, it is not a coercive proceeding. Only coercive proceedings yield results when adversaries are white-collar criminals. Yet naming and shaming must be encouraged if only to ostracise defaulters and make them marked men and women.
(The author is a senior columnist and tweets @smurlidharan)
If Khalistanis can storm Indian High Commission in London, why not give same rights to Argentinian protesters in Delhi?
Time is ripe for the West to realise that India’s patience is running thin. Anyway, friendship can’t be a one-way traffic
Which countries allow same-sex marriage? Will India join the club?
Opposing the legal recognition of same-sex marriages, the Indian government has said that ‘they will cause havoc’. The matter now lies before the Supreme Court. As the debate continues, we look at how nations have approved such unions
Bhopal gas tragedy: Why did India’s Supreme Court reject more compensation for survivors?
Rejecting the Indian government’s curative petition that sought more funds for the victims of the 1984 Bhopal gas tragedy, the top court said it would open up Pandora’s box. The American company, Union Carbide, responsible for the disaster had paid the survivors Rs 715 crore in damages in 1989