GDP back series data: New numbers are more broad-based and better reflection of economy, says Arun Jaitley
The immediate impact of the revision based on the new GDP series was on the last two years of the UPA Government, said Arun Jaitley
The Niti Aayog on Wednesday hosted a news conference by its Vice Chairman Rajiv Kumar and Chief Statistician Pravin Srivastava to announce GDP back-series data.
Congress leader P Chidambaram called the revision a "hatchet job" by the Niti Aayog, while former chief statistician Pronab Sen questioned the involvement of the Aayog.
Reacting to the controversy, finance minister Arun Jaitley has written a Facebook blog. Read the full text of the blog here:
The CSO, in the year 2015, changed the way of calculating Gross Domestic Product (GDP). GDP growth rate estimates were revised from the year 2012-13 onwards with 2011-12 being the base year. Since then, every quarter and annually, GDP data is released on that basis. The immediate impact of the revision based on the new GDP series was on the last two years of the UPA Government. For the year 2012-13 the growth rate was revised from 4.7% to 5.1% and later again to 5.5%. Similarly, for 2013-14 the GDP growth rate was revised from 5% to 6.9% and later revised to 6.4%.
What did the UPA say in 2015
Once the new GDP estimates were given, my predecessor Shri P. Chidambaram publically welcomed the new series. He said “the new data successfully establishes the fact that UPA succeeded to revive the economy. The revised GDP data will end misconceived charges that UPA mismanaged the economy” (3rd February, 2015).
The basis of new series
The new series is more broad-based and is a better reflection of the Indian economy. It is globally more comparable. Most experts, including those who have headed the CSO, have opined that this better represents the real state of the Indian economy. Obviously, when the new series is in place, it has to be used as a basis for backward revision. So what was revised from the year 2011-12 onwards is now being revised from 2004-05. Consequently, the same basis which improved the growth estimate in the last two years of the UPA Government somewhat downgraded it in the earlier years. Those who took after the new series in 2015 now consider the new series to be a “hatched job” and a “bad joke”. What humours some when data shows an upward trend depresses them if it moves in the reverse direction.
The Congress party
The Congress Party’s reaction is given by those who perhaps have a nodding acquaintance with the subject. Data based on facts and on the best global practices is rejected by the Party because it takes away the last of its surviving arguments “my GDP growth was higher than yours”.
The CSO under various Governments has always functioned objectively. It maintains an arms length distance from the Finance Ministry. North Block becomes aware of the final figures only when they are released. It is an organisation that has global credibility. No one in India has ever imputed motives to the CSO. The sooner the Congress Party realises that its policy paralysis pushed India into the Fragile 5, the better it will be for the Party and its leadership.
Subscribe to Moneycontrol Pro at ₹499 for the first year. Use code PRO499. Limited period offer. *T&C apply
However, the annual GDP estimate for the fiscal year ending 31 March has been revised to an 8 percent contraction, deeper than an earlier estimate of (-) 7.7 percent
The AIBEA said the move will make it more difficult for public sector banks to lend to weaker and priority sectors at concessional rates of interest
Over the years, India has seen numerous such examples of stadiums being named or renamed after political leaders.