Fitch Ratings places Bharti Airtel on 'rating watch negative' on Supreme Court ruling
Fitch Ratings has placed Bharti Airtel Ltd on 'rating watch negative' over unpaid regulatory dues arising from a recent Supreme Court ruling

-
Fitch Ratings has placed Bharti Airtel Ltd on 'rating watch negative' over unpaid regulatory dues arising from a recent Supreme Court ruling
-
Fitch placed Bhariti's 'BBB-' Long-Term Foreign-Currency Issuer Default Rating (IDR) on Rating Watch Negative (RWN) as well as its and Bharti Airtel International (Netherlands) BV's senior unsecured bonds and Network i2i's subordinated perpetual bonds on RWN
-
The Supreme Court ruling is credit-negative for the industry, after DoT's demand of unpaid dues on licence fees and spectrum usage charges of at least $19 billion from telcos, it said
New Delhi: Fitch Ratings has placed Bharti Airtel Ltd on 'rating watch negative' over unpaid regulatory dues arising from a recent Supreme Court ruling.
Fitch placed Bhariti's 'BBB-' Long-Term Foreign-Currency Issuer Default Rating (IDR) on Rating Watch Negative (RWN) as well as its and Bharti Airtel International (Netherlands) BV's senior unsecured bonds and Network i2i's subordinated perpetual bonds on RWN.
"The RWN reflects uncertainty on the amount and timing of unpaid regulatory dues, after India's Supreme Court ruled on 24 October in favour of the country's Department of Telecommunication's (DoT) definition of adjusted gross revenue (AGR).
"This led to DOT's demand that Bharti pay unpaid dues on licence fees of $3 billion. There may be another potential demand of $2.9 billion in regard to unpaid dues on spectrum usage charges," Fitch said in a statement.

Representational image. Reuters.
The resolution of the RWN, which may take more than six months, requires clarity on the exact amount and timing of the payment of unpaid dues and whether the government will provide any financial relief to the telecom sector affected by the court ruling, it said.
Fitch estimated that Bharti's funds from operations (FFO) adjusted net leverage could worsen to around 3.1x-3.4x for the financial year ending March 2020 (FY20, earlier estimate of 2.0x-2.2x) -- excluding $6.3 billion in deferred spectrum costs -- if the company had to pay entire estimated unpaid dues of $5.9 billion, funded out of debt.
"This leverage would be significantly higher than 2.5x threshold above which Fitch would consider negative rating action. However, Bharti may be able to partly fund the unpaid dues through a planned stake sale of $2.5-3.5 billion in the combined Bharti Infratel (Infratel) and Indus Tower entity, which is awaiting regulatory approval of the merger," it said.
However, deconsolidation of Infratel-Indus would lead to cash outflow for tower lease rentals, nullifying any significant leverage benefits.
The company has approached the government to seek clarity on the exact amount and relief on the unpaid dues, out of which interest and penalties constitute about 75 percent.
The Supreme Court ruling is credit-negative for the industry, after DoT's demand of unpaid dues on licence fees and spectrum usage charges of at least $19 billion from telcos, it said.
The court also ruled that telcos are liable to pay not just the principal but also the interest and penalty within three months of the order.
The demand for unpaid dues pertains to a 14-year-old dispute regarding the definition of AGR, which DoT said should include all kinds of income generated by the telcos. Typically, telcos pay about 3-5 percent of AGR as spectrum usages charges and 8 percent as licence fees.
Fitch said Bharti's leverage is unlikely to materially improve the case due to negative free cash flow (FCF).
"We forecast negative FCF in FY20 (FY19: negative Rs 21,900 crore), as cash flow from operations of Rs 22,000-24,500 crore will be insufficient to fund large capex plans and moderate dividends of Rs 3,000-4,000 crore.
"Barring regulatory dues, we expect FY20 capex/revenue to remain high at 34%-37%, with forecast capex of around $4 billion, as Bharti continues to strengthen its 4G network and fibre infrastructure. However, the company expects core capex, which excludes deferred spectrum payments, to have peaked and to decline significantly in FY20," it said.
The rating agency expected the government to hold 5G spectrum auction in the next 12-18 months but felt the incumbents may not participate if they have to pay unpaid regulatory dues in the short term.
also read

If Khalistanis can storm Indian High Commission in London, why not give same rights to Argentinian protesters in Delhi?
Time is ripe for the West to realise that India’s patience is running thin. Anyway, friendship can’t be a one-way traffic

Which countries allow same-sex marriage? Will India join the club?
Opposing the legal recognition of same-sex marriages, the Indian government has said that ‘they will cause havoc’. The matter now lies before the Supreme Court. As the debate continues, we look at how nations have approved such unions

Bhopal gas tragedy: Why did India’s Supreme Court reject more compensation for survivors?
Rejecting the Indian government’s curative petition that sought more funds for the victims of the 1984 Bhopal gas tragedy, the top court said it would open up Pandora’s box. The American company, Union Carbide, responsible for the disaster had paid the survivors Rs 715 crore in damages in 1989