Faulty hip implants: Delhi HC asks Johnson & Johnson for interim payment of Rs 25 lakh to 4 patients

The court's direction came after Johnson & Johnson said it was willing to pay Rs 25 lakh as compensation to the patients who were affected by the implants.

Press Trust of India May 02, 2019 18:44:22 IST
Faulty hip implants: Delhi HC asks Johnson & Johnson for interim payment of Rs 25 lakh to 4 patients
  • The court listed the matter for further hearing on 29 May and asked CDSCO to give details of all claimants to the firm

  • The court also granted one week more to the Centre to file its response to the petition

  • The company had contended that the Centre has no jurisdiction to fix and enforce compensation

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Thursday directed Johnson and Johnson to make an interim payment of Rs 25 lakh each to four patients after verifying that they have undergone revision surgeries on receiving faulty hip implants made by the company.

The court's direction came after the company said it was willing to pay Rs 25 lakh as compensation to the patients who were affected by the implants.

Justice Vibhu Bakhru asked the company to give a list of all the claimants who are registered with it after verifying that they have undergone revision surgeries.

The court listed the matter for further hearing on 29 May and asked the Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO) to give the details of all the claimants, which it has, to the company.

Faulty hip implants Delhi HC asks Johnson  Johnson for interim payment of Rs 25 lakh to 4 patients

Representational image. Reuters

CDSCO had asked the company to pay Rs 65 lakh, Rs 74 lakh, Rs 1 crore and Rs 90.26 lakh respectively to four patients.

As an interim, the court asked the company pay Rs 25 lakh to these four patients for whom CDSCO has already issued orders, after verification of their documents.

The court was hearing the company's plea challenging a press release issued by the ministry of health and family welfare asking it to pay compensation to all the affected patients, as determined by the reports of the committees formed to examine the issues relating to its faulty hip implants.

The company has also challenged the orders by which it was directed to pay compensation to patients.

The court also granted one week more to the Centre, represented through Central government standing counsel Amit Mahajan, to file its response to the petition.

Senior advocate Sandeep Sethi, representing the company, informed the court that it has identified certain number of patients who were eligible for compensation after a verification process.

"We have set down terms of eligibility...he/she is not entitled if he/she has not undergone the revision surgery," he said, adding that the number of eligible patients is around 250.

The company had earlier contended that the Centre has no jurisdiction under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act to fix and enforce the compensation.

It said the recent orders of the Centre fixing the compensation is based on a formula and reports by a set of expert committees and recommendations which have already been challenged by the company and are pending in the high court.

It added that the Drugs and Cosmetics Act does not have any provisions that provide for a formula for payment of compensation in the matters pertaining to medical devices.

In the earlier petition filed in December last year, the company has sought quashing of a government's press release informing the general public about the formula worked out by an expert committee to compensate patients who received the faulty hip implants produced by the pharma major's subsidiary, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc (USA).

It has also challenged the report of the expert committee — headed by R K Arya, Director, Sports Injury Centre — which worked out the compensation formula.

Besides, it has sought quashing of the report of another committee -- headed by Arun Agarwal, professor of ENT, Maulana Azad Medical College — which was appointed by the Health Ministry for looking into the allegations of faulty hip replacement implants.

According to the Arya committee report, compensation payable to patients would be determined in terms of the disability by the faulty hip implants in relation to their age.

The pharma major had earlier told the court that as a result of the press release, people are "landing at its doorstep" for compensation and contended that the government's public announcement was made without any legal basis.

A public interest litigation (PIL), which was earlier before the Supreme Court, has alleged that "faulty" and "deadly" hip implants have been fitted into the bodies of 4,525 Indian patients.

The plea has contended that DePuy makes, sells and exports medical implants, including articular surface replacements (ASR) hip implants which have been withdrawn by the firms on their own in 2010 on the ground that they were defective.

According to the PIL, the firms "illegally sold DePuy ASR Hip Implants in India from 2005 to 2006".

Updated Date:

Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Get technology news, gadgets reviews & ratings. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison.

also read

'Suspend implementation of farm laws or we will do it': SC lashes out at Centre over handling of farmer protests
India

'Suspend implementation of farm laws or we will do it': SC lashes out at Centre over handling of farmer protests

The court further said it is 'extremely disappointed' with the way negotiations are going on between the Centre and the farmers on the new farm laws

Farmers' Protest Updates: ML Khattar should tell Centre to repeal laws instead of holding outreach events, says Hooda
India

Farmers' Protest Updates: ML Khattar should tell Centre to repeal laws instead of holding outreach events, says Hooda

Farmers' Protest LIVE Updates: On Sunday, Haryana Police had used water cannons and lobbed teargas shells to prevent the farmers from marching towards the venue of Khattar's event

SC stays farm laws but forms expert panel to ease negotiations; farmers say no talks, only repeal
India

SC stays farm laws but forms expert panel to ease negotiations; farmers say no talks, only repeal

The farmers have not only categorically refused to engage with the said 'expert panel', which includes two domain experts and two farmer leaders, but have also asserted that their tractor march on Republic Day will be held as per schedule