Twist in tale: Why repaying loans is not a priority for farmers

Supali :Two years ago, Vilas Yelmar took out a loan of Rs 200,000 to develop a small grape orchard in a dusty hamlet southeast of Mumbai. The bank has repeatedly asked for the loan to be repaid, but Yelmar, whose annual income has risen to Rs 20,00,000 has spent the money on a new sport utility vehicle and a lavish family wedding.

He is one of an increasing number of ‘wilful’ defaulters in India, where banks are under government pressure to lend to farmers. Two-thirds of the population depend on agriculture for their livelihood and, to boost productivity- annual agricultural growth is just 3 percent - India has this year raised the farm lending target for banks by a fifth to more than $100 billion.

“My brother was the village head so it had to be a big wedding. That’s where the money went,” said Yelmar, speaking the local Marathi language, and proudly showing off his new SUV which he uses to ferry barrels of diesel and fertilisers.

More from Economy

Inflation likely to be a big focus area for budget 2024, say sources Explained: Will the Bank of Japan break tradition and raise interest rates?

“Paying off the bank loan is not really my priority,” said the 39-year-old, who lives in a simple, yet spacious, house next to his 4-acre orchard near the main irrigation channel.

[caption id=“attachment_328598” align=“alignleft” width=“380” caption=“Wilfully defaulting farmers are giving banks a multi-billion-dollar headache. Reuters”]  [/caption]

Banks and government officials do not have data on just how many subprime farmers are abusing the cheap loan system, but they are giving banks a multi-billion-dollar headache.

MORAL HAZARD

State Bank of India, which accounts for about a quarter of India’s total loans, including the one to Yelmar, said about 9 percent of its farm loans, turned bad in the year to end-March. Bankers bemoan the rise in ‘wilful’ defaults among those taking agricultural loans - and using them to marry off their daughters, build extensions for their farmhouses, or become lenders themselves.

Defaults also tend to increase when elections loom as farmers hope the government, desperate for their votes, will bail them out. The government bailed out farmers in 2008 with a Rs60,000-crore loan waiver, but a struggling economy and swollen fiscal deficit make another rescue unlikely.

“Agriculture loans are more retractable, depending on what type of whispers go around. If the whispers are about elections and debt waivers then interest payments drop,” said SBI Chairman Pratip Chaudhuri, noting the rise in defaults is a big concern for the bank.

Under the government’s targets, banks have to go out of their way to lend to poor and marginal farmers who may not be able to repay the loans. If banks fail to meet the targets, the RBI locks up the shortfall for five years in a fund that returns just 4-5 percent a year.

Bad farm loans contributed nearly 44 percent of new non-performing loans (NPLs) in fiscal year 2011, and have jumped 150 percent in the past two years. In the year to March 2011, sour agriculture loans almost doubled to 3.5 percent of total loans by state-run banks, which account for about 70 percent of India’s total loans and deposits.

“The pace at which agri-NPLs have increased has been worrisome,” said Suresh Ganapathy, an analyst with Macquarie Research. “The willingness to repay has been affected by debt waivers … and that has created a moral hazard.”

Yelmar, who said he doesn’t want his children to have to resort to farming, got a heavy interest rate discount of 3 percent on his SBI loan, thanks to government handouts, compared to the 14-15 percent interest corporate borrowers are asked to pay. Some lenders even offer zero interest on farm loans.

But, for the banks, getting any money back can be an issue.

“The cost of servicing an agriculture loan is very high. During every harvest, you need an army of people to go out there and collect dues from each farmer,” said Michael Andrade, senior vice-president for agri-lending at HDFC Bank. “This increases your costs, and hurts profitability, bottom lines.”

BRANDED DEFAULTERS

For years, unpredictable rainfall decided the pace of farm loan defaults in India, where nearly half the arable land is rain-fed. A drought triggers an increase in defaults.

“You can’t do anything if there’s a drought. It erases the entire year’s returns,” says Babasaheb Mahadev Parekar, 29, a sugarcane farmer from Korti village, 10 km from Supali. Parekar’s extended family of 16 children lives in a small house by a narrow canal that is used to water crops.

Parekar is struggling to repay a loan of Rs 2,75,000 that he and his brothers took out from SBI in mid-2009. With interest, the loan has swelled to Rs 4,16,000. The Parekars wanted to use the money for land levelling, but the worst drought in nearly four decades wiped out their crops. The following year, a bumper cane yield could have helped them repay the loan, but Parekar’s father had a heart attack, which ate into savings, and last year the family spent the rest on a wedding, leaving SBI waiting in vain to get its loan back.

“We desperately need more loans, but banks are not willing to give as we have defaulted,” said Parekar who fell back on farming when he failed to find a job after graduating.

Once branded as defaulters, other banks won’t lend them money, so Parekar plans to borrow from money lenders to pay off the SBI loan and then apply for new farm loans.

The head of farm loans at SBI’s Pandharpur branch, which lent to both Parekar and Yelmar, said: “When it comes to repayment, farmers give the least importance to the bank. We need to constantly chase them.”

“It’s not like they say they won’t pay up. They keep postponing. They keep saying: we don’t have money, when we do, we’ll pay. So, all banks can do is wait,” he added.

NEED FOR REFORM

The pressure on banks to help farmers has been ratcheted up by an increase in suicides in recent years, as cash-strapped farmers turned to money lenders charging interest as high as 12 percent a month. Bank lending to small farmers more than doubled over five years, but farm output growth averaged just 3 percent over that period.

To also protect farmers from unscrupulous money lenders, banks were told they could not attach farmland as collateral for loans, making them unsecured and a bigger risk. In most countries, farmland is used as collateral for such loans, though in the United States, the Farm Credit System and private lenders are increasingly accepting farm cash flow and assets such as $200,000 combine harvesters to set against loans.

There is also no government incentive for banks to lend towards irrigation or newer techniques to boost productivity and prevent drought. Bankers complain that a large chunk of farm loans goes only to buy seeds or fertilizers, rather than on mechanisation. India is the world’s second-biggest producer of rice, cotton, wheat and sugar, but its productivity is way below the world average.

India’s banks now want policy reforms and regulatory intervention to make the business of farm lending more viable.

“This is a policy issue,” SBI’s Chaudhuri said. “If there’s an incentive for term loans, capital formation in agriculture would increase.”

Others say more needs to be done to boost infrastructure which, in turn, should help farmers become more productive.

“Flogging the banks alone is not going to work,” said another senior SBI executive. “Government agencies have to become active - they need to provide roads, Internet and the infrastructure. How else do we reach the interiors?”

In the meantime, with increased pressure on their assets and rising corporate defaults, banks are having to show some muscle to get their money back - setting up recovery camps and “boosting collections through persistence,” said N. Seshadri, executive director at Bank of India.

SBI has started naming and shaming wilful defaulters by putting their pictures in newspapers to get them to pay up.

Reuters