E-retailers cannot influence prices of goods on platform; must adhere to fair trade practices: Draft guidelines
The Consumer Affairs Ministry has issued draft 'The Consumer Protection (e-Commerce) Rules, 2019 and sought comments on the same by 2 December
The Consumer Affairs Ministry has issued a draft of 'The Consumer Protection (e-Commerce) Rules, 2019 and sought comments on the same by 2 December
Traders' body CAIT has welcomed the draft rules and said the proposed framework will "force" e-commerce companies to be more transparent and accountable towards customers
As per the draft, an e-commerce entity should not "directly or indirectly influence the price of the goods or services" and "maintain a level-playing field"
New Delhi: E-commerce companies cannot influence prices of products being sold on their platform and must adhere to fair trade practices, as per the draft rules proposed by the Consumer Affairs Ministry.
The ministry has issued draft 'The Consumer Protection (e-Commerce) Rules, 2019 and sought comments on the same by 2 December.
The ministry has to frame rules under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, which has recently been passed by Parliament.
Traders' body CAIT has welcomed the draft rules and said the proposed framework will "force" e-commerce companies to be more transparent and accountable towards customers.
As per the draft, an e-commerce entity should not "directly or indirectly influence the price of the goods or services" and "maintain a level-playing field".
It should not "adopt any trade practice which for the purpose of promoting the sale, use or supply of any goods or for the provision of any service, or composite supply, adopts any unfair methods or unfair or deceptive practice that may influence transactional decisions of consumers in relation to products and services".
As per the draft rules, e-commerce players have been prohibited from falsely representing themselves as consumers and post reviews, misrepresent or exaggerate the quality or the features of goods and services.
The e-commerce entities will also have to furnish details about sellers, including the identity of their business, legal name, principal geographic address, name of the website, the products they sell, and how they can be contacted by customers.
According to the draft, e-commerce companies will have to protect personal data and information of the customers.
An e-commerce entity should "ensure that personally identifiable information of customers is protected and that such data collection and storage and use comply with provisions of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008."
Another provision will entail e-commerce companies to accept the return of goods, if delivered late, or if the product is defective, wrong or spurious.
They should effect all payments towards accepted refund requests of the customers within a period of a maximum of 14 days, it added.
The proposal also asks e-commerce companies to display terms of contracts with the sellers relating to return, refund, exchange, warranty/guarantee, delivery/shipment, mode of payments, grievance redressal mechanism, etc. to enable consumers to make informed decisions.
Terming the move as a positive step, CAIT Secretary General Praveen Khandelwal said the proposed rules will "certainly force the e-commerce entity to be more transparent and impartial and accountable towards consumers".
"...the Consumer Affairs Ministry has to ensure that e-commerce companies should follow the rules not only in letter but in spirit as well. We have seen that in spite of FDI policy in place, the e-commerce companies remain violative of the policy right under the nose of the Government," he added.
Interestingly, Internet and Mobile Association of India has—in its submission—said the proposed model framework will cause "unnecessary compliance burden" for online shopping companies and negatively impact the ease of doing business in India.
The attacks, which drew widespread global condemnation, began on 26 November and lasted until 29 November 2008. A total of 166 people died in the attack, including six Jews. All of the six were killed at the Nariman House, popularly also known as the Chabad House
A draft of the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Bill, 2022, was released by the Centre on Friday which makes it necessary for individuals to give consent before their data can be processed. However, some critics have flagged concerns about certain provisions of the proposed Bill
The digital personal data protection bill frames out the rights and duties of the citizens on one hand and the data fiduciary's obligations to use collective data lawfully on the other, why do we need such a bill or an act? Tune in to find out