Cooper, Apollo legal battle intensifies; Dec 19 court hearing crucial

Cooper Tire and Rubber Co will make a last-ditch effort to save its sale to Apollo Tyres Ltd on December 19, as it seeks a ruling from Delaware Supreme Court that could force the Indian company to complete their proposed $2.3-billion merger.

Apollo, which would become the world’s seventh-biggest tyre maker, wants to pay less than the $35 per share agreed in June because of demands by unions at Cooper plants and disruptions at Cooper’s venture in China.

[caption id=“attachment_1233593” align=“alignleft” width=“380”]  Apollo Tyres will make a last ditch effort to clinch Cooper deal. Reuters. [/caption]

Cooper wants the Supreme Court to overturn a ruling by a judge on the lower Court of Chancery who found last week that Apollo had not breached its obligations under the deal. A new ruling would have to be issued by December 31, when the merger agreement allows Apollo to walk away.

More from Business

Hyundai India’s Rs 27,870 crore IPO oversubscribed by 2.28X, largely driven by institutional investors How Indian fintech startups are driving Malaysia’s UPI-like digital payments revolution

Apollo declined to comment. Cooper did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The Chancery judge, Sam Glasscock, had rejected Cooper’s allegation that Apollo was falling short of its requirement under the deal to reach new contract terms with unions at Cooper plants in Ohio and Texas.

Cooper also wants the Supreme Court to issue a declaration that Apollo is in breach of the merger. That would allow the fourth-largest North American tire maker to return to Glasscock’s court and ask for an order directing Apollo to close.

Apollo has argued Cooper is actually the one who has not kept up its end of the bargain.

As Apollo sees it, Cooper is at fault because it has been locked out of its Chinese joint venture. Without information from the venture, which accounts for a quarter of Cooper’s business, the US company failed to report its financial data by Thursday as required for Apollo to get financing.

Impact Shorts

More Shorts

Chennai Ranks #1 in Challan Checks: ACKO Insights for Smarter Car and Two Wheeler Insurance Decisions

Tata Harrier EV vs Mahindra XEV 9e: Design and road presence compared

Cooper has argued that the Chinese lock-out and labor problems would never have happened without the merger agreement. Risks associated with the deal were taken on by Apollo and should have been baked into its bid, according to Cooper.

The parties have agreed to have the dispute decided in Delaware’s courts, which have a reputation for handling complex business disputes quickly.

In October, Delaware’s Supreme Court issued a ruling from the bench to reverse a Court of Chancery order that had blocked an $8.2 billion deal between Vivendi SA and Activision Blizzard.

The merger would deliver a significant premium to Cooper shareholders.

Reuters