Civil aviation min offers point by point rebuttal of CAG report

The Civil Aviation Ministry has said CAG’s observations that “undue benefits” were given to the operator of the Delhi International Airport are erronous.

In a point-by-point rebuttal of the auditor’s observations on the Delhi International Airport (DIAL), the Ministry told Parliament’s Public Accounts Committee (PAC) that the process of selection of joint venture partners was completed as per laid-down procedure, and by observing all relevant guidelines in accordance with the decisions of the Union Cabinet and the Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM).

[caption id=“attachment_482088” align=“alignleft” width=“380”]  The T3 Terminus of the Delhi international airport: Reuters[/caption]

It said the process also underwent judicial scrutiny and was validated by the Supreme Court.

More from Business

Hyundai India’s Rs 27,870 crore IPO oversubscribed by 2.28X, largely driven by institutional investors How Indian fintech startups are driving Malaysia’s UPI-like digital payments revolution

“No discrepancies were found at any stage. The entire process has been examined at nine levels of scrutiny…,” the Ministry informed the PAC in a written submission.

On the issue of CAG’s observation on conflict between Operation Management and Development Agreement (OMDA) and Airport Economic Regulatory Authority (AERA) Act, the Ministry said the OMDA pre-dates the AERA Act.

“The non-aeronautical services mentioned under OMDA were part of the bidding process. It is totally absurd to say that this provision was made for giving undue advantage to DIAL.

Impact Shorts

More Shorts

Tata Harrier EV vs Mahindra XEV 9e: Design and road presence compared

As Trump weaponises tariff, Fed sees a bigger worry: Not jobs, but rising prices in America

Had that been the case, AERA Act should have been enacted to match the provisions of OMDA…,” it said.

Referring to the auditor’s observation on misuse of the concept of upfront fee, the Civil Aviation Ministry said the condition was mentioned in the bidding documents.

The issue, it said, was discussed in the meeting of the EGoM where it was observed that between the two options of levying OMDA fee as a percentage of gross revenue and per passenger/ per ton cargo fee, the former was considered more beneficial.

“The Inter-Ministerial Group (IMG) had analysed the average profit of both AAI airports and broadly firmed up the profit of the order of Rs 150 crore for each airport in 2003-04. Hence, IMG recommended Rs 150 crore as upfront fee to be levied on JVC of both (Delhi and Mumbai) airports as one-time payment to AAI.

“Therefore, the quantum of upfront fee (Rs 150 crore) had no relation with the extent of land and asset at the airport,” it said.

“… Therefore, entire observation of CAG audit is erroneous,” the Ministry told the PAC.

PTI