By Diane Bartz and David Shepardson
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - AT&T Inc
The planned deal, approved without conditions, is seen as a turning point for a media industry that has been upended by companies like Netflix Inc
The decision comes despite criticism from Trump, a frequent detractor of Time Warner's CNN and its coverage. The deal was announced in October 2016 and quickly denounced by Trump.
The ruling could also prompt a cascade of pay TV companies buying television and movie makers, with Comcast Corp's
The merger, including debt, would be the fourth largest deal ever attempted in the global telecom, media and entertainment space, according to Thomson Reuters data. It would also be the 12th largest deal in any sector, the data showed.
"I conclude that the government has failed to meet its burden of proof," District Court Judge Richard Leon told the court. He called one of the government's arguments against the deal "gossamer thin."
The judge in a scathing opinion urged the U.S. government not to seek a stay of his ruling, saying it would be "manifestly unjust" to do so and not likely to succeed.
Shares of AT&T fell about 1.3 percent in after-hours trade following the decision, while Time Warner rose more than 5 percent. Comcast was down 3 percent.
"The court is the last place you want to accomplish your M&A goal but in this case it was a sweet victory," said Jeffrey Logsdon, managing director of JBL Advisors in California.
"This will be a blockbuster summer for media mergers!" said Mary Ann Halford, senior adviser to OC&C Strategy Consultants.
The Justice Department filed a lawsuit to stop the deal in November 2017, saying that AT&T's ownership of both DirecTV and Time Warner would give AT&T unfair leverage against rival cable providers that relied on Time Warner's content, such as CNN and HBO's "Game of Thrones."
Leaving the courtroom, Makan Delrahim, head of the Justice department’s antitrust division, said that he would read the judge’s opinion before making a decision on an appeal.
Asked about the decision, he said, “Obviously we don’t agree.”
AT&T in a six-week trial argued that the purchase of Time Warner would allow it to gain information about viewers needed to target digital advertising, much like Facebook Inc
AT&T and other wireless carriers need to find new sources of revenue as the mobile phone market stagnates and more customers abandon pricey cable and satellite packages for streaming services they can watch on their phones or televisions.
The government estimated costs to industry rivals, such as Charter Communications Inc
To assuage the Trump administration's criticisms, AT&T offered to submit pricing disagreements with other pay TV companies over Turner's channels to third-party arbitration. The companies further offered not to black out programming during arbitration for seven years.
Before the trial started, AT&T lawyers said the Time Warner deal may have been singled out for government enforcement but Judge Leon of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia rejected their bid to force the disclosure of White House communications that might have shed light on the matter.
The deal cost AT&T's top lobbyist, Bob Quinn, his job in May after it became public that AT&T had paid Trump's personal lawyer Michael Cohen $600,000 for advice on winning approval.
The ruling could also have implications for CBS Corp's
(Reporting by Diane Bartz and David Shepardson; Additional reporting by Ginger Gibson in Washington and Sheila Dang in New York; Writing by Peter Henderson; Editing by Lisa Shumaker)
This story has not been edited by Firstpost staff and is generated by auto-feed.
Updated Date: Jun 13, 2018 04:05 AM