A day after Supreme Court verdict against Anil Ambani, RCom asks lenders to release Rs 260 cr directly to Ericsson
Observing there was a 'willful default', the Supreme Court ordered RCom to clear the Rs 453 crore dues to Swedish telecom equipment maker Ericsson within four weeks or face a 3-month jail term.
The Supreme Court on Wednesday found Anil Ambani guilty of contempt of court
The court ordered RCom to clear Rs 453 crore dues to Ericsson within four weeks or face a 3-month jail term
The apex court directed the registry to pay Rs 118 crore deposited by the RCom to Ericsson
Reliance Communications (RCom) said on Thursday it has urged its lenders to allow release of Rs 260 crore ($36.55 million) directly to telecom equipment maker Ericsson.
RCom said that it had received the sum as income tax refunds and is lying in its bank account.
The Supreme Court on Wednesday found Anil Ambani, chairman of debt-laden RCom, guilty of contempt of court for willfully failing to pay Rs 550 crore to Ericsson.
Observing there was a 'willful default', the Supreme Court ordered the debt-laden company to clear the Rs 453 crore dues to Swedish telecom equipment maker Ericsson within four weeks or face a 3-month jail term.
In a verdict that came as a setback to Ambani, the apex court also pulled up the industrialist for his "cavalier attitude" demonstrated through the affidavit filed in the court and said any "unconditional apology" given must be rejected.
Besides Ambani, the court held Reliance Telecom Ltd chairman Satish Seth and Reliance Infratel Ltd Chhaya Virani as well as their three companies guilty of contempt of court,
"The RCom group is directed to purge the contempt of this court by payment to Ericsson the sum of Rs 453 crore within a period of four weeks from today (Wednesday). In default of such payment, the chairmen who have given undertakings to this court will suffer three months imprisonment," said a bench of Justices R F Nariman and Vineet Saran.
It directed the registry of the apex court to pay Rs 118 crore deposited by the RCom group to Ericsson within a period of one week from Wednesday.
The court said there is no doubt that the three Reliance companies have "willfully not paid the sum of Rs 550 crore plus interest and have thus breached the undertakings given to this court".
"We are also of the view that in the facts of the present case, willful default is made out...," the court said, adding it is not a case of accidental or unintentional disobedience.
It also imposed Rs 1 crore fine on each of the three companies and directed the amount to be deposited with the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee within four weeks from today and in case of default the chairmen of these companies will have to undergo one month's imprisonment.
Shortly after the pronouncement of the verdict, senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, who appeared for Ambani, said he respects the decision of the apex court and expressed confidence that the group will honour the directions on payment of dues to Ericsson.
"We respect the Supreme Court's order. We have faced our difficulties. However, the court ruled the way it has ruled," Rohatgi told PTI.
"I am sure RCom will honour the Supreme Court's order," he added.
The 41-page verdict by the apex court came on three contempt petitions filed by Ericsson for non-payment of its Rs 550 crores dues for the work of operation, maintenance, and management of RCom's network the telecom equipment maker has done since 2013.
— With inputs from agencies
Election Commission asks political parties to disclose cost of 'revdi' and reveal how it will be funded
By proposing the reform, the Election Commission of India aims to inform voters about the financial feasibility of election promises in manifestos and also whether they are sustainable within the financial space of the state or the Union government
A bench headed by Justice DY Chandrachud asked Justice Rao to prepare a road map for amending the constitution and holding elections by December 15, 2022
The apex court is hearing arguments on a batch of petitions challenging the Karnataka High Court verdict refusing to lift the ban on hijab in educational institutions of the state that have prescribed uniforms