Pak SC strikes down contempt law; Will PM Ashraf be disqualified?

Aug 3, 2012

Islamabad: Pakistan’s Supreme Court today struck down the government’s new contempt law, aimed to prevent the premier being pressured to revive graft cases against President Asif Ali Zardari, setting the stage for the possible disqualification of Prime Minister Raja Pervez Ashraf.

A five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry ruled that the Contempt of Court Act of 2012 was “unconstitutional” and struck it down.

The bench gave its order in response to more than 25 petitions that had challenged the new law.

Prime Minister Raja Pervez Ashraf. AFP

The order issued by the court said: “Thus, having been left with no constitutional option, Contempt of Court Act 2012 is declared unconstitutional, void and non est, as a
consequence whereof…it is declared that the Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003 shall be deemed to have revived…”

President Zardari had on 12 July signed into law the new Contempt of Court Act after it was passed by the two houses of Parliament.

The law was aimed at saving Prime Minister Ashraf from possible disqualification by the apex court for refusing to reopen corruption cases against Zardari in Switzerland.

The government had contended that the option of initiating contempt of court proceedings against the premier for not acting on the apex court’s order had ended with the passage of the new Contempt of Court Act.

The new law had protected top government functionaries, including the President, Prime Minister and provincial Governors, from contempt for their executive actions.

Today’s judgement came five days before another bench takes up the case related to the apex court’s order to the government to approach Swiss authorities to revive the graft
cases against Zardari.

Prime Minister Ashraf’s predecessor, Yousuf Raza Gilani, was disqualified on 19 June by the apex court following his conviction of contempt for refusing to reopen the cases
against Zardari.

Legal experts have said Ashraf could face the same fate if he refuses to revive the graft cases.

The Supreme Court’s order said the new contempt of court law had reduced the powers of the courts and provided immunity to government functionaries that violated constitutional
provisions.

“It may be mentioned that this court has the power of judicial review to examine the constitutionality of any provision of any enactment, if the same is found to be
contrary to the Fundamental Rights as well as constitutional provisions,” the order said.

“A perusal of Contempt of Court Act 2012 suggests that it has been promulgated in haste obviously for reasons which have been admitted by learned counsel for the federation in the
wake of the history of the impugned legislation…including the recent decision of the seven-member bench passed on 26.04.2012, in pursuance whereof the then Prime Minister was
found guilty of contempt of court followed by another judgment declaring him to be disqualified…,” the order further said.

The bench cited several judgements by the Indian Supreme Court on the issue of contempt of court in its order.

PTI

Also see

Firstpost encourages open discussion and debate, but please adhere to the rules below, before posting. Comments that are found to be in violation of any one or more of the guidelines will be automatically deleted:

Personal attacks/name calling will not be tolerated. This applies to comments directed at the author, other commenters and other politicians/public figures

Please do not post comments that target a specific community, caste, nationality or religion.

While you do not have to use your real name, any commenters using any Firstpost writer's name will be deleted, and the commenter banned from participating in any future discussions.

Comments will be moderated for abusive and offensive language.

Please read our comments and moderation policy before posting