'How long will Cong protect a terrorist?' Rijiju hits out over Ishrat Jahan row - Firstpost

'How long will Cong protect a terrorist?' Rijiju hits out over Ishrat Jahan row

New Delhi: Union minister Kiren Rijiju on Monday accused former Home Minister P Chidambaram of making a "delirious attempt to escape" in the Ishrat Jahan controversy by saying an under secretary had signed the second affidavit contradicting an earlier submission that the 19-year-old girl, killed in an alleged fake encounter, was an LeT activist.

"It is a delirious attempt to escape. An under secretary signs in an affidavit only after the minister approves," Rijiju told reporters.

He was reacting to Chidambaram's comments on the controversy surrounding the change in affidavits done during the latter's tenure as the Home Minister, saying, "The Home Minister does not sign affidavits. It is signed by an under secretary."

Kiren Rijiju. File photo. PTI

Kiren Rijiju. File photo. PTI

"A compromise in national security is too serious an issue to be diverted. The Congress can't divert it with an aberrant excuse. For how long will the Congress protect a terrorist?" Rijiju asked.

Chidambaram had also said that the affidavit controversy was to "divert attention" from the real issue, which is whether it was a "fake" encounter or not.

Ishrat, Javed Shaikh alias Pranesh Pillai, Amjadali Akbarali Rana and Zeeshan Johar were killed in an encounter with Gujarat Police on the outskirts of Ahmedabad on 15 June, 2004.

The Gujarat Police had then said that those killed in the encounters were LeT terrorists and had landed in the state to kill the then chief minister Narendra Modi.

The first affidavit, filed in the Gujarat High Court based on inputs from Maharashtra and Gujarat Police besides the Intelligence Bureau, said that Ishrat, from Mumbai outskirts, was a Lashkar-e-Taiba activist, but this aspect was ignored in the
second affidavit, Home Ministry officials said.

The second affidavit, claimed to have been drafted by Chidambaram, said there was no conclusive evidence to prove that Ishrat was a terrorist.

Comment using Disqus

Show Comments