New Delhi: An all-party meeting called on FDI issue failed to end the logjam over the issue. Meanwhile the Samajwadi Party and BSP provided some relief to the government by not insisting on voting and Trinamool Congress sprang a surprise by speaking in a similar tone.
However, UPA ally DMK kept the suspense over its position on voting while conveying its concerns over allowing 51 percent FDI in multi-brand retail.
Opposition parties, including NDA, AIADMK, BJD, Left parties, TDP and JD(S) insisted on a discussion under rules entailing voting, making it clear that trouble will continue in Parliament which failed to transact any business for the third straight day today over the issue.
"There will be no compromise on (discussion under Rule) 184 (which entails voting)," said Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Sushma Swaraj after the two-and-a-half hour-long meeting. Asked if the BJP would not allow Parliament to function, she replied, "no compromise at all... When I said no compromise, it means something."
Highlighting the fact that there was no meeting ground between the government and opposition over voting issue, Shiv Sena leader Anant Geete said, "There was a discussion but no decision."
The government got comfort as its outside supporters SP and BSP made it clear that they would be willing for discussion under any rule. They did not press for voting and left the decision to the Presiding Officers of both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha.
Trinamool Congress, which only last week moved a No-Confidence Motion over the FDI issue, sprang a surprise as it also did not insist on voting and said the Chair should decide the rule under which discussion could take place.
"When our no-confidence motion was refused, now let the Speaker decide under which section discussion can take place," Trinamool Congress leader Sudip Bandopadhyay told reporters after the meeting chaired by Leader of the Lok Sabha Sushilkumar Shinde.
"Opposition is moving with begging bowl in hand for Rule 184," he said.Insisting that Trinamool is "totally against" introduction of FDI in retail and capping of subsidised LPG cylinders at six per year, Bandopadhyay said, "Let the Opposition bring another no confidence motion, we will support them. We had given them the golden opportunity to no-confidence motion and not just (rule) 184 or 193."
Rule 184 entails voting while Rule 193 does not.At the meeting, DMK leader T R Baalu conveyed his party's concerns over allowing 51 per cent FDI in retail. But he remained vague on whether or not his party would want voting on the issue.
AIADMK insisted on voting as did JD(U), BJD and some other parties.Finance Minister P Chidambaram and Commerce and Industry Minister Anand Sharma justified the decision by citing the difficult economic situation.
Sharma sought to reject the Opposition charge that the FDI decision was taken in a haste and without proper consultations. He said the government had discussed the issue with all stake-holders before the decision.
The government had taken the decision to allow 51 percent FDI in multi-brand retail in November last year but put it on hold following strong objections from parties, including the then UPA constituent Trinamool Congress. The hold was removed in September this year.
Published Date: Nov 26, 2012 07:05 pm | Updated Date: Dec 20, 2014 02:19 pm