Thursday, May 23rd 06:09 PM IST

Why were norms flouted? SC to Centre on coal blocks allocations

by Sep 14, 2012

Questioning the alleged violation of norms while allocating coal blocks, the Supreme Court today gave the Centre eight weeks time to explain what went wrong in the process.

The Supreme Court was acting on a petition filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation.

Lawyer MN Sharma, who filed the petition on behalf of Centre for Public Interest Litigation, said the guidelines were flouted during the allocation of coal blocks and they need to be reallocated.

Supreme Court of India. Reuters

The apex court bench constituting Justice RL Lodha and Justice Anil R Dave wanted to know if it was a coincidence that most of the allocated blocks had some connection to politicians.

The bench also observed that the CAG is a constitutional authority and there is nothing wrong in relying on its report.

Taking the matter seriously, the apex court observed that the government owes an explanation in this regard. The court also turned down the government’s plea that the matter should not dealt with by the highest court as the Public Accounts Committee is already looking into it.

Also see

Firstpost encourages open discussion and debate, but please adhere to the rules below, before posting. Comments that are found to be in violation of any one or more of the guidelines will be automatically deleted:

Personal attacks/name calling will not be tolerated. This applies to comments directed at the author, other commenters and other politicians/public figures

Please do not post comments that target a specific community, caste, nationality or religion.

While you do not have to use your real name, any commenters using any Firstpost writer's name will be deleted, and the commenter banned from participating in any future discussions.

Comments will be moderated for abusive and offensive language.

Please read our comments and moderation policy before posting