Probe report on Radia tapes leak ‘hardly satisfactory’: SC

Aug 28, 2012

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today pulled up the Centre over leakage of its tapped conversation of former corporate lobbyist Niira Radia saying its probe report is hardly satisfactory.

A bench of justices GS Singhvi and SJ Mukhopadhaya also took strong exception to the Centre's failure to put in place a proper mechanism to prevent such leakage in future.

"Those probe reports are hardly satisfactory. The less said the better. Somebody must be made accountable for the leakage," the bench said after the Centre submitted to it that the leakage has not been done on its part or by its officials.

Radia's phones were tapped by the Income Tax department and leaked to media houses. Reuters

"There is no reply on how to prevent such leakages in future. In future it will again happen. If you are not able to protect, then why you go for tapping," the bench observed.

It also said the probe report submitted by the government does not specifically give clean chit to any department.

Tata Group Chairman Ratan Tata had moved the apex court on 29 November, 2010 for action against those involved in the leakage of the tapes saying that the leakage amounted to infringement of his fundamental right to life, which includes right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution.

The conversations were recorded by the government as part of surveillance of Radia's phone, ordered by the Directorate General of Income Tax (Investigation) on a complaint received by the Finance Minister on 16 November, 2007 alleging that within a span of nine years, she had built up a business empire worth Rs 300 crore.

The government had recorded 180 days of Radia's conversations -- first from 20 August, 2008 onwards for 60 days and then from 19 October for another 60 days. Later on 11 May, 2009, her phone was again put on surveillance for another 60 days following a fresh order given on 8 May.

PTI

politics trump card game

Firstpost encourages open discussion and debate, but please adhere to the rules below, before posting. Comments that are found to be in violation of any one or more of the guidelines will be automatically deleted:

Personal attacks/name calling will not be tolerated. This applies to comments directed at the author, other commenters and other politicians/public figures

Please do not post comments that target a specific community, caste, nationality or religion.

While you do not have to use your real name, any commenters using any Firstpost writer's name will be deleted, and the commenter banned from participating in any future discussions.

Comments will be moderated for abusive and offensive language.

Please read our comments and moderation policy before posting

x