New Delhi: Justice CS Karnan of the Madras High Court, who courted controversy by staying the CJI's order transferring him to Calcutta High Court, on Tuesday admitted that he had issued an "erroneous" order due to his "mental frustration resulting in the loss of his mental balance."
In a letter to the Chief Justice of India and two Supreme Court judges – Justices JS Khehar and R Banumathi, Justice
Karnan claimed he was "disturbed" due to various incidents where he was "ridiculed" by some judges due to which he was frustrated.
"On February 15, 2016, I had sent an erroneous order due to my mental frustration resulting in loss of mental balance
since I was disturbed because various incidents," Justice Karnan said.
In his letter, he said: "Hereafter, I will still continue to foster a harmonious attitude to one and all, and will appreciate your kind reciprocation and oblige."
He gave two instances of harassment and "ridicule" against him to buttress his point and said he had sent a complaint to the Chairman of National Commission of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and other high dignitaries three years ago.
The media had reported the incident and "urged me to reveal the names of the Judges who indulged in such ugly pranks but I refused to do so only to uphold the sanctity of the judiciary and also maintain communal harmony," he said.
Justice Karnan had on 15 February stayed his transfer order, a development which took place after the apex court had asked the Chief Justice of Madras High Court not to assign any judicial work to him.
The same day the apex court had suspended Justice Karnan's order and made it clear that all administrative and judicial orders passed by him after the issuance of a proposal of his transfer from Madras High Court to Calcutta High Court shall remain stayed till further orders.
The apex court had passed the directions on an application moved by the Registrar of Madras High Court, who is also private secretary to the Chief Justice, seeking an order to restrain Justice Karnan from doing any judicial work.
Published Date: Feb 23, 2016 08:09 pm | Updated Date: Feb 23, 2016 08:09 pm