ICC withdraws disciplinary charges against Sri Lankan batsman Kusal Perera

PTI, May, 12 2016

Dubai: The International Cricket Council has announced that it has withdrawn disciplinary charges against Sri Lanka batsman Kusal Perera and has lifted the provisional suspension previously imposed on him for alleged use of performance enhancing substances. Perera is now free to return to domestic and international cricket without restriction and with immediate effect.

The ICC has made the decision after the WADA-accredited laboratory in Qatar withdrew its original Adverse Analytical Finding following investigations on Wednesday. ICC chief executive David Richardson said, "We wish to make it clear that there is no evidence that Perera has ever used performance-enhancing substances and we wish him well in his future cricketing endeavours."

File image of Sri Lankan cricketer Kusal Perera. AFP

File image of Sri Lankan cricketer Kusal Perera. AFP

In November 2015, the laboratory had reported to the ICC that urine samples collected out of competition from Perera, had tested positive for 19-Norandrostenedione, an anabolic steroid prohibited under WADA's prohibited list.

Pursuant to the ICC's WADA-compliant anti-doping code, the full laboratory documentation packages in respect of each of the findings were reviewed by three members of the ICC's Independent Review Board (comprising world leaders in medical, scientific and legal anti-doping fields), each of whom independently confirmed that Perera had a case to answer.

Accordingly, on 7 December, ICC charged Perera with an anti-doping rule violation and, in accordance with the mandatory requirements of the code, provisionally suspended him until that charge was resolved. Since that time, ICC has worked with Perera's lawyers as they have attempted to identify the source of the 19-Norandrostenedione found in the samples. As part of those efforts, ICC sought further information from the laboratory and granted various extensions of time to the player's legal team to allow it to carry out additional analysis and investigation work.

In addition, the Qatar laboratory analysed the B-samples provided by Perera in January 2016, and reported that their analysis confirmed the presence of the same substance in those samples as well.

In a recent letter, Perera's lawyers provided an update on their investigation into potential sources of the 19-Norandrostenedione found in his samples, but also suggested for the first time that Qatar might have misidentified impurities in the samples as 19-Norandrostenedione, given the very low concentrations of that substance found in the samples.

In response, ICC commissioned an independent expert to review all of the laboratory's findings. While the independent expert concluded that the lab had correctly identified 19-Norandrostenedione in the samples, an adverse analytical finding by the laboratory was not sustainable, because, for various scientific and technical reasons, it could not be ruled out that the 19-Norandrostenedione was produced naturally in the player's body and/or formed in the samples after the player provided them.

These concerns were immediately presented by the ICC to the laboratory, which then confirmed on Wednesday that it has withdrawn the Adverse Analytical Finding and is instead reporting an Atypical Finding. It has advised that no specific further investigation of the player's two samples is warranted, but has recommended the monitoring of the player's steroid profile moving forward. As a result, ICC immediately withdrew the disciplinary proceedings brought against Perera, and he is now free to train and compete domestically and internationally again without restriction with immediate effect.

Richardson said, "Cricket is proud of its compliance with the structures and systems required by WADA and takes comfort from the fact that samples are tested in accordance with WADA-approved standards and at WADA-accredited laboratories. However, the ICC is troubled in this case by the fact that the Qatar laboratory has issued an Adverse Analytical Finding that has then had to be withdrawn and replaced with an Atypical Finding. While I am confident that this is an isolated incident in respect of tests commissioned by the ICC, we are seeking an urgent explanation from WADA and the laboratory in an attempt to understand what has transpired and what will be done to ensure it does not happen again. We will also immediately review our own internal processes to see whether there might be additional steps over and above those required by WADA that the ICC could put in place in order to give international cricketers further comfort."

"Had it not been for the diligence of Perera’s legal team and the ICC's own desire to uncover the explanation for the reported findings, the consequences could well have been different, and that should be of concern to all involved in the fight against doping. We regret what Perera has had to endure, and would like to commend him for the manner in which he has conducted himself throughout this period," he added.

Published Date: May 12, 2016 | Updated Date: May 12, 2016



Rank Team Points Rating
1 India 4493 125
2 South Africa 3395 110
3 England 4097 105
4 Australia 3087 100
5 New Zealand 3114 97
Rank Team Points Rating
1 South Africa 5957 119
2 Australia 5505 117
3 India 4579 114
4 England 5645 113
5 New Zealand 5123 111
Rank Team Points Rating
1 New Zealand 1625 125
2 England 1962 123
3 Pakistan 2417 121
4 West Indies 2222 117
5 India 2183 115