SC's tough questions to Vijay Mallya: Were your asset disclosure, $40 mn transfer to kids kosher?

New Delhi:Liquor baron Vijay Mallya, who is presently in the United Kingdom, was on Thursday posed searching questions by the Supreme Court which asked him about the "truthfulness" of his disclosure of assets and transfer of US $40 million to his children. The Supreme Court reserved its order on a plea of a consortium of banks, led by State Bank of India, that $40 million, which Mallya had allegedly transferred to his children, needed to be brought back.

A bench of Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel and Justice and U U Lalit also reserved its order on their plea seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against Mallya.

"You answer us whether you have disclosed your assets truthfully? Did you violate the Karnataka High Court order (restraining Mallya from transferring and alienating assets) by transferring US $40 million," the bench asked senior advocate C S Vaidyanathan, representing Mallya.

At the outset, the bench also posed several queries to the consortium of lending banks led by State Bank of India and asked it whether any criminal proceedings have been initiated against Mallya.

Vijay Mallya. AFP

Vijay Mallya. AFP

"Was any security taken at the time of giving the loan? Was the security adequate? If not, then why the loan was advanced without sufficient security.

"Is it not a case of misrepresentation with regard to security?," the bench asked.

The court then asked Mallya as to why he did not disclose the receipt of US $40 million from London-based company Diageo Plc and subsequent transfer of money to trusts to which his three children were the beneficiaries.

The banks have alleged that Mallya concealed the facts and diverted the money to his son Siddharth Mallya and daughters Leanna Mallya and Tanya Mallya in "flagrant violation" of the orders passed by the Karnataka High Court.

Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi and senior advocate Shyam Divan, appearing for the banks, contended that unless Mallya deposits US $40 million before this court, he does not deserve to be heard and, moreover, he needed to appear personally as the contempt notice has already been issued.

"He did not disclose the US $40 million deal with Diageo to this court. He took the Supreme Court for a ride, cares two hoots for the courts," Rohatgi said.

In response to the query as to how the orders of the court would be enforced, he said that the government is seeking deportation of Mallya from the UK.


Published Date: Mar 10, 2017 08:06 am | Updated Date: Mar 10, 2017 08:08 am