Modi snoopgate: Mysterious observations from the tape transcripts

Editors note: This is a reader comment we got on the article, "Amit Shah snooping row: Modi orders inquiry under Ahmedabad HC judge." The Insider has written about his interpretation of the tapes that many people are yet to study in detail and raises important questions about the contents of the tape. As is Firstpost policy, we have lightly edited for grammar and spelling, but the comment has been left as is. by The Insider The whole web is in clash with pro and anti Modi brigades. Many of them are taking the stand without even listening to full transcripts. A responsible media house should put the full transcripts online and then allow people to Judge. But I was lucky to have the full alleged transcripts from the web. A close observation would enable us to understand some mysterious conclusions as follows. [caption id=“attachment_1251593” align=“alignleft” width=“380”]  What is the truth behind the tapes? AFP[/caption] 1)The father’s version that it was for the security of the daughter is a farce. Either he has saved Modi and his daughter for fear of privacy or the father does not want action on his daughter if she was (knowingly or unknowingly) indulging in any mischief which might have forced him to issue a letter in the way he did. The entire operation was not security but of some investigative nature. 2) The objective of the operation was to find out whether she is visiting or being visited by somebody or speaking to or being spoken to by somebody. This “somebody” may not necessarily be Mr Pradeep Sharma. Apart from him both Amit Shah and Singhal is pursuing some one else. Who is that someone and what for is not known. 3) Many time the tapes reveal that Amit Shah wants to reconfirm whether the girl is there in the house or room. Or has she dodged the police to go out and meet somebody. The tapes reveal that both Amit Shah and Singhal are apprehensive that the girl might do so. Why should the girl do so. What was her motive? 4) In one conversation Amit Shah says to check whether Sharma is still in Bhavnagar only while she is in Ahmedabad to check whether Sharma was secretly planning to meet the girl. Also Amit Shah says to Singhal that Sharma or “Him (who is it not clear) will start once again with her Tactics” What was the “Tactics” that was done earlier which got exposed to them. Why were the “Tactics” employed? 5) In another instance Amit Shah says to Singhal not to allow her to go to Mumbai in flight en route to Ahmedabad. Why was the girl expected to go to Mumbai? Who was there? Why shroud she be prevented to go to Mumbai? What was she planning and her Motive? 6) While she was in Gujarat Amit shah and Singhal discuss the meeting of her and the boy. Who is the boy? Amit Shah reconfirms with Singhal that whether the parents are not on board over her meeting with the boy. What was the family’s indulgence in the whole issue? 7) Several times Amit Shah enquires whether anyone came to her room without the knowledge of the snooping police. Who was suspected to come and meet her? And also Amit shah says to secure information about whoever comes and meets or talks to her which shows that they were in pursuit of a third person. 8) The tapes also brings to notice that the girl may be willing to dodge the police of her movements. If so, was she in knowledge? What was her motive for dodging the police if she has no mistakes on her part? In one place Amit shah asks to check the STD booth through which she had made a call. When mobile phone is available why would she use a public phone ? Was she aware that her phone is tapped? 9) In all the tailing There is not much calls from or to her mobile which is being discussed by both Amit Shah and Singhal. Was she dodging the police using public phone throughout? If so, why? 10) In one place Amit shah Says that “Saheb” got information about this and that. Was SAHEB (suspected to be MODI) having a parallel investigation unit which was even more swift? In another place Amit shah says that “SAHEB has come to know there is major activity” . What was the “activity”? In all the conversations it is clear the girl might be of full indulgence and even suspected to be part of a mysterious motive with some third persons or as if indulging in some mischief either willingly or due to some third person’s pressure (persons as it may not be one) Also doubt arises that whether some other people used her against Modi using their two relationship. If so what was the third people planning and why? Also how is that Sharma is appointed as the advisor to Home ministry. Is it the Home ministry which planned some thing against Modi using Sharma’s service and his links (the girl)? Which also rises the question that why CBI is also so silent in this as equal to Modi in spite of having the tapes for long time?? Can the media analyse the transcripts?